Published: 11/12/2009 12:11:02 - PDF Version (79 KB)
RIBBON-2 results demonstrated that adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer significantly improved progression-free survival.
"Potentially, we have another biologic agent that can improve the survival or at least the progression-free survival of women with metastatic breast cancer," said Dr. Adam Brufsky, associate professor of medicine, associate chief of haematology-oncology and associate director of clinical investigation, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.
"Clearly, this may be an indication to use bevacizumab in this setting, but we really have to consider the results of this trial in terms of how best to use these drugs in metastatic breast cancer."
Results of three phase III studies - E2100, AVADO and RIBBON-1 - have shown the clinical benefit of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy as a first-line metastatic breast cancer treatment. Brufsky and colleagues designed RIBBON-2 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy as a second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
The study included 684 patients in 19 countries at 211 sites. Patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: one prior cytotoxic treatment for metastatic breast cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, HER2 negative disease and no central nervous system metastases.
The primary endpoint was progression-free survival; secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, duration of response and safety. Researchers randomly assigned patients to chemotherapy plus bevacizumab or chemotherapy plus placebo.
The results were predictable, Brufsky said. Adding bevacizumab to various chemotherapy regimens as a second-line metastatic breast cancer treatment significantly improved progression-free survival.
"The fact that bevacizumab has a benefit in first- and second-line treatment really begs the question: Should we be giving this drug to someone through the entire course of metastatic disease?" he said.
To address this question, Brufsky and colleagues are considering conducting a long-term clinical trial that to compare bevacizumab or no bevacizumab treatment in women with metastatic breast cancer.
Source: www.sabcs.org
Watch a press briefing by Prof Adam Brufsky on ecancertv here.
No comments have been posted yet. Post a comment.

New molecular marker could predict if breast cancer patients need chemotherapy
CTC screening for colorectal cancer not cost-effective when reimbursed at same rate as colonoscopy
Women in their forties have lower mammographic tumour detectability
Genetic risk score associated with breast cancer risk
New roundtable debate: communicating risk in familial cancer
Study finds that the GRB7 gene drives an aggressive form of the disease
ASCO updates guideline on adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer
NICE guideline set to improve care of cancer patients with unknown primary
Childhood cancer survivors may have abnormal long-term cardiac function