<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>ecancermedicalscience Policy Documents RSS Feed</title><link>http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/</link><description>This RSS feed lets you know when new articles are added to the ecancermedicalscience website.</description><webMaster>dev@2cs.com;kelly@brandcastmedia.com;linda.cairns@ifom-ieo-campus.it;gordon.mcvie@ieo.it;jonathan@ecancermedicalscience.com;</webMaster><language>en</language><item><title><![CDATA[Safe practice and nursing care of patients receiving oral anticancer medicines: a position statement from UKONS]]></title><link>http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2010.177</link><pubdate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubdate><description><![CDATA[This position statement has been formulated by oncology nurses from the UK Oncology Nursing Society (UKONS) to provide guidance for nurses on safe practice with oral anticancer medicines. The ultimate aim is to ensure that patients are not only well informed and capable of managing their oral anticancer medicines but also supported safely and effectively while they are receiving these treatments.<br/>]]></description></item><item><title><![CDATA[The role of funding and policies on innovation in cancer drug development]]></title><link>http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2010.164</link><pubdate>Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubdate><description><![CDATA[During the past two decades, cancer incidence has steadily increased due to aging populations, lifestyle and environmental factors, with great personal and national economic consequences. Concurrently, cancer treatments have improved with increased treatment options as well as lengthier disease and disease-free survival rates.<br/><br/>The latest innovation in cancer treatments are targeted biological treatments, joining the current arsenal of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, particularly significant<br/>in latter stage cancers associated with very poor survival.<br/><br/>Despite this latest breakthrough in cancer treatment, this has in fact only opened the door to beginning to understand the complexity of cancer on a molecular and genetic basis. Oncology research and development (R&D) has the highest failure rate for new molecular entities (NME) and significantly higher development costs. Although tremendous scientific and economic barriers exist, the oncology development market<br/>has increased two-fold over the past five years.<br/><br/>This report aims to map current oncology R&D funding and management, primarily in Europe and the USA, to examine public-private relationships, current oncology R&D strategies and oncology innovation policies. Its objectives are:<br/><br/> - To map current funding and management of oncology R&D via questionnaire<br/>surveys and interviews of oncology experts;<br/> - To produce a high-resolution bibliometric analysis of oncology drug R&D in<br/>order to better understand the public-private mix in research activity;<br/> - To investigate the cumulative life-time funding of specific oncology drugs;<br/> - To review current public policy affecting oncology drug R&D, specifically, public<br/>R&D investment policies, transnational investment policies, regulatory policies,<br/>and drug reimbursement policies; and<br/> - To propose future oncology policies supporting the R&D process.]]></description></item><item><title><![CDATA[Laboratory-based management of microbiological alerts: Effects of an automated system on the surveillance and treatment of nosocomial infections in an oncology hospital]]></title><link>http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2009.137</link><pubdate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubdate><description><![CDATA[Background: Prevention and surveillance programs are key to contain Nosocomial Infections (Nis).  At the European Institute of Oncology, surveillance based on ex-post data collection has always been done since the inception of hospital activity; laboratory-based surveillance of microbiological alert was not standardized. This study describes the issues related to the recent introduction in hospital routine of a laboratory-based automated surveillance system and its clinical impact on monitoring and treatment of Nis.<br/><br/>Methods: An interdisciplinary team defined the alerts and the actions to be taken in response; recipients of the alert messages were identified and software was programmed. Program features were created so their employment would generate a prompt notification of clinically critical results. After a training period, the program was introduced in the hospital routine.<br/><br/>Results: There were a total of 150 generated alerts; the main alert related to microorganisms requiring prompt patient isolation and/or public notification. Clinical use of the program was relevant in detection and immediate notification of Cytomegalovirus active infection in stem cell recipients and central venous catheter – related candidemia: the prompt administration of adequate treatment was possible hours in advance compared to the previous approach. <br/>Conclusions: A laboratory-based automated surveillance system is effective in facilitating the management of NIs; its clinical employment also leads to important clinical advantages in patient care.<br/>]]></description></item><item><title><![CDATA[Potential contribution of aspirin to cancer control programmes]]></title><link>http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2008.100</link><pubdate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubdate><description><![CDATA[Abstract<br/><br/>Chemoprevention describes the potential of chemicals to intervene and block multistage carcinogenesis.  Aspirin (acetylsalicylate) is showing cancer chemopreventive potential and the medicine has public health potential given that low-doses also reduce the risk of cardiovascular events by up to 30%.  Whilst recognising that aspirin has undesirable effects, perhaps the medicine may compliment other cancer control programmes such as screening and lifestyle measures.  Furthermore, perhaps the cancer chemopreventive potential of aspirin might be mediated, at least in part, by salicylate which is present in fruits and vegetables.  Salicylate might therefore be considered to be a nutraceutical.  Furthermore, there are a number of matters that arise including the potential for the public health field to further advocate the self-care preventive agenda, which might include aspirin.  Perhaps it is now timely for a conference on the public health potential of aspirin to be convened.<br/><br/>Key words : <br/>aspirin, cancer control, salicylate, nutraceutical, public health          <br/>]]></description></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eurocan Plus Report: Feasibility Study for Coordination of National Cancer Research Activities]]></title><link>http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/eCMS.2008.84</link><pubdate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubdate><description><![CDATA[The process that resulted in the submission and funding of the Eurocan+Plus Project by the 6th Framework Programme was initiated by the European Parliament.<br/><br/>This report summarises the key findings and conclusions of the Eurocan+Plus Project which ran between October 2005 and December 2007, and outlines proposals for action in the short and the longer term.<br/><br/>Participants in the Project represented themselves and not the institution where they work. The Project was in no way a formal collaboration between any governmental body, funding agency, research or medical institution of any of the 27 EU Member States. In this respect, proposals in this Summary Report and in other deliverables in no way represent a formal commitment ofany governmental or non-governmental institution for any idea proposed by the Project.<br/><br/>For more information on the topics developed in this report, interested readers are invited to consult the reports issued by the different Work Packages. These reports can be consulted on the Project website www.eurocanplus.eu.]]></description></item><item><title><![CDATA[Policy Challenges for Cancer Research: A Call to Arms]]></title><link>http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2008.53</link><pubdate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubdate><description><![CDATA[Research has delivered remarkable benefits for cancer patients and their families since James Watson and Francis Crick wrote the now immortal line, "We wish to propose a structure for the salt of deoxyribonucleic acid" thus setting the molecular foundations for the modern era of cancer control.  The pace of technological innovation from fundamental scientific discoveries to the policy impact of huge population studies has been breathtaking. One has only to contrast a paper on the treatment of solid epithelial cancers written by Henri Tagnon and colleagues in 1966  with the myriad of chemotherapeutic approaches at the oncologists disposal today. Inevitably, as the tide of research has risen so it has bought the flotsam and jetsam of regulations and policies. Some have been helpful, many pointless and too many actually harmful. Naturally some of these regulatory and general policies (by this I mean those concerned with funding, structure and organisation) have been specifically targeted at cancer research, e.g. US National Cancer Act 1971, whilst others have been a product of the general regulatory environment with indirect consequences for cancer research, e.g. EU Data Protection Directive 1995. Policy issues thus cover a vast terrain criss-crossed by complex interdependencies between scientific areas, countries S&T policies and socio-political constructs. Unfortunately there has been little attention paid to the consequences of these policy issues from which the research community has, by and large, been passenger rather than driver.]]></description></item></channel></rss>